CoronaVirus/Pfizer

© Shutterstock, screenshot/Pfizer/KJN

Vaccine makers have zippo to lose past marketing their experimental COVID-19 shots, fifty-fifty if they cause serious injury and decease, as they enjoy total indemnity against injuries occurring from COVID-19 vaccines or any other pandemic vaccine under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Human activity, passed in the U.S. in 2005.

The full extent of their COVID-19 vaccine indemnification agreements with countries, however, is a closely guarded clandestine, one that has remained highly confidential — until at present. A leaked certificate broken downward by Twitter user Ehden reveals the shocking terms of Pfizer'due south international COVID-19 vaccine agreements. He wrote:

"These agreements are confidential, but luckily one country did not protect the contract document well plenty, so I managed to get a hold of a re-create. As you are about to encounter, there is a skilful reason why Pfizer was fighting to hide the details of these contracts."

An ironclad agreement, all on Pfizer'southward terms

The alleged indemnification agreement, reportedly between Pfizer and Albania, was originally posted in snippets on Twitter, but Twitter at present has them marked as "unavailable." Copies of the tweets are bachelor on Treadreader, yet.

The Albania agreement appears very like to another contract, published online, between Pfizer and the Dominican Republic. Information technology covers not only COVID-xix vaccines, but any production that enhances the use or furnishings of such vaccines. Countries that purchase Pfizer'due south COVID-19 shot must acknowledge that "Pfizer'south efforts to develop and manufacture the Production" are "field of study to significant risks and uncertainties."

And in the event that a drug or other treatment comes out that tin prevent, treat or cure COVID-19, the agreement stands, and the country must follow through with their order. Ivermectin , for instance, is not just safe, inexpensive and widely available but has been found to reduce COVID-19 mort ality by 81% . Nevertheless, it continues to be ignored in favor of more expensive, and less constructive, treatments and mass experimental vaccination. Ehden wrote:

"If yous were wondering why #Ivermectin was suppressed, well, information technology is because the agreement that countries had with Pfizer does not allow them to escape their contract, which states that even if a drug will exist found to treat COVID19 the contract cannot be voided."

Even if Pfizer fails to deliver vaccine doses within their estimated delivery period, the purchaser may not cancel the order. Further, Pfizer tin can make adjustments to the number of contracted doses and their delivery schedule, "based on principles to exist determined by Pfizer," and the state buying the vaccines must "hold to any revision."

It doesn't matter if the vaccines are delivered severely belatedly, even at a point when they're no longer needed, as it's made clear that

"Nether no circumstances will Pfizer exist bailiwick to or liable for whatsoever belatedly delivery penalties." Every bit you lot might suspect, the contract as well "forbids returns nether any circumstances."

The large hugger-mugger: Pfizer charged U.Southward. More than Than Other Countries

While COVID-xix vaccines are "free" to receive in the U.S., they're existence paid for by taxpayer dollars at a rate of $19.5011 per dose. Albania, the leaked contract revealed, paid $12 per dose, while the EU paid $14.70 per shot. While charging unlike prices to unlike purchases is common in the drug manufacture, it'due south frequently frowned upon.

In the example of the price disparity between the U.S. and the EU, Pfizer is said to accept given a price break to the European union because it financially supported the development of their COVID-19 vaccine. Still, Ehden noted, "U.South. taxpayers got screwed past Pfizer, probably too State of israel." Likewise, Pfizer makes a betoken to annotation that countries have no right to withhold payment to the company for any reason.

Apparently, this includes in the case of receiving damaged appurtenances. Purchasers of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccines are not entitled to pass up them "based on service complaints," unless they practise not conform to specifications or the FDA's Current Practiced Manufacturing Practice regulations. And, Ehden adds, "This understanding is above whatever local law of the state."

While the purchaser has virtually no mode of canceling the contract, Pfizer can terminate the agreement in the effect of a "material breach" of whatsoever term in their contract.

Safety and efficacy 'not currently known'

The purchaser of Pfizer'due south COVID-19 vaccine must also admit 2 facts that take largely been brushed nether the rug: Both their efficacy and risks are unknown. According to section 5.5 of the contract:

"Purchaser acknowledges that the Vaccine and materials related to the Vaccine, and their components and constituent materials are being rapidly developed due to the emergency circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic and will continue to exist studied afterward provision of the Vaccine to Purchaser under this Agreement.

"Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that at that place may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known."

Indemnification by the purchaser is as well explicitly required by the contract, which states, nether section 8.one:

"Purchaser hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and concur harmless Pfizer, BioNTech, each of their Affiliates, contractors, sub-contractors, licensors, licensees, sub-licensees, distributors, contract manufacturers, services providers, clinical trial researchers, third parties to whom Pfizer or BioNTech or any of their corresponding Affiliates may directly or indirectly owe an indemnity based on the enquiry ...
"from and against any and all suits, claims, actions, demands, losses, damages, liabilities, settlements, penalties, fines, costs and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and other expenses of an investigation or litigation ... arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the Vaccine ..."

Meanwhile, the purchaser must besides keep the terms of the contract confidential for a catamenia of 10 years.

Not only does Pfizer have total indemnification, but at that place's also a section in the contract titled, "Assumption of Defence past Purchaser," which states that in the outcome Pfizer suffers losses for which it is seeking indemnification, the purchaser

"shall promptly assume conduct and control of the defense of such Indemnified Claims on behalf of the Indemnitee with counsel acceptable to Indemnitee(s), whether or not the Indemnified Claim is rightfully brought."

Ehden notes:

"Pfizer is making sure the country volition pay for everything: 'Costs and expenses, including ... fees and disbursements of counsel, incurred by the Indemnitee(due south) in connexion with any Indemnified Claim shall be reimbursed on a quarterly basis by Purchaser.'"

Cached in the March 17, 2020, Federal Annals — the daily journal of the U.S. government — in a certificate titled, "Declaration Under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Human activity for Medical Countermeasures Against COVID-19," is language that establishes a new COVID-nineteen vaccine courtroom — similar to the federal vaccine courtroom that already exists.

In the U.S., vaccine makers already enjoy full indemnity confronting injuries occurring from this or whatsoever other pandemic vaccine nether the PREP Act. If you're injured past a COVID vaccine (or a select grouping of other vaccines designated nether the deed), you'd have to file a compensation claim with the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Programme (CICP), which is funded past U.S. taxpayers via Congressional cribbing to the Department of Wellness and Human being Services (DHHS).

While similar to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), which applies to nonpandemic vaccines, the CICP is even less generous when information technology comes to bounty. As reported past Dr. Meryl Nass, the maximum payout you tin receive — even in cases of permanent disability or death — is $250,000 per person; yet, y'all'd have to exhaust your private insurance policy earlier the CICP gives you a dime.

The CICP also has a one-year statute of limitations, so y'all have to act chop-chop, which is likewise difficult since it's unknown if long-term effects could occur more than a year later.

Pfizer accused of corruption of power

Equally is apparent in Pfizer's confidential contract with Republic of albania, the drug giant wants governments to guarantee the company will exist compensated for whatever expenses resulting from injury lawsuits against it. Pfizer has too demanded that countries put up sovereign assets , including bank reserves, military machine bases and embassy buildings, as collateral for expected vaccine injury lawsuits resulting from its COVID-19 inoculation.

New Delhi-based World Is Ane News (WION) reported in February 2021 that Brazil rejected Pfizer's demands, calling them "calumniating." The demands included that Brazil:

  1. "Waives sovereignty of its avails abroad in favor of Pfizer."
  2. Non apply its domestic laws to the visitor.
  3. Not penalize Pfizer for vaccine commitment delays.
  4. Exempt Pfizer from all civil liability for side effects.

STAT News besides referred to concerns by legal experts, who likewise suggested Pfizer'due south demands were an abuse of power. Mark Eccleston-Turner, a lecturer in global health law at Keele Academy in England, told STAT:

"[Pfizer] is trying to eke out as much profit and minimize its risk at every juncture with this vaccine evolution then this vaccine rollout. At present, the vaccine development has been heavily subsidized already. So there's very minimal risk for the manufacturer involved at that place."

Signs of COVID vaccine failure, adverse furnishings rise

Pfizer continues to sign lucrative hole-and-corner vaccine deals across the world. In June 2021, they signed one of their biggest contracts to engagement — with the Philippine government for 40 1000000 doses .

Meanwhile, COVID-xix "breakthrough cases," which used to be chosen vaccine failures, are on the rising. Co-ordinate to the U.Southward. Centers for Illness Control and Prevention (CDC), as of July xix, five,914 people who had been fully vaccinated for COVID-19 were hospitalized or died from COVID-nineteen.

In the U.K., as of July fifteen, 87.five% of the adult population had received one dose of COVID-19 vaccine and 67.i% had received two. Yet, symptomatic cases among partially and fully vaccinated are on the rise , with an average of 15,537 new infections a day being detected, a 40% increment from the calendar week before.

In a July nineteen report from the CDC, the agency also reported that the Vaccine Agin Consequence Reporting System (VAERS) had received 12,313 reports of decease among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine — more than than doubling from the vi,079 reports of death from the week before.

Soon afterwards the report, however, they reverted the number to the 6,079 from the week before, indicating by default that no deaths from the vaccine had occurred that week, raising serious questions near transparency and vaccine safe.

Many other adverse events are as well actualization, ranging in risks from the biologically active SARS-CoV-2 spike protein used in the vaccine to blood clots, reproductive toxicity and myocarditis ( heart inflammation ). As you tin see in the confidential indemnification agreements, notwithstanding, even if the vaccine turns out to be a dismal failure — and a hazard to curt- and long-term wellness — countries have no recourse, nor does anyone who received the experimental shots.

One question that we should all be asking is this: If the COVID-19 vaccines are, in fact, as safe and effective as the manufacturers claim, why do they require this level of indemnification?

The views and opinions expressed in this commodity are those of the authors and practice not necessarily reflect the views of Children's Health Defence force.